one clear deliverable and one tightly scoped output
Engagement models before fixed price theatre
Pricing Guide
We do not pretend every project can be priced like a menu item. A one-page audit, a sourcing sprint, a keynote deck, a pre-shipment control job and a monthly design production bench do not use the same kind of effort. This page explains how we structure engagements before we quote the work.
short focused push for a page, deck, audit or sourcing round
reserved working capacity across mixed tasks
supplier, sample, shipment or document coordination
recurring production for pages, decks and visual assets
Engagement models
Choose the operating shape before asking for a number.
A useful pricing conversation starts by identifying the nature of the work. Is it a narrow task, a time-boxed push, a recurring production need, a China-side coordination job, or an ongoing design bench?
For one narrow deliverable.
Best when the input and output are obvious: review a page, rewrite an RFQ reply, compare a quote sheet or check a shipment label set.
- clear deliverable
- limited revisions
- fast where possible
For a short focused project push.
Best when several connected pieces must move together: landing page cleanup, supplier search, sales deck rebuild or analytics review.
- defined window
- multiple outputs
- clear review rhythm
For ongoing studio access.
Best when the company repeatedly needs commercial review, design work, buyer communication, web updates or China-side support.
- reserved capacity
- mixed task queue
- recurring delivery
For sourcing and shipment reality.
Best when the project depends on supplier search, quote review, sample coordination, pre-shipment photos or document coordination support.
- local follow-up
- evidence collection
- not legal brokerage
For repeated visual production.
Best when a team needs product graphics, sales decks, web sections, e-commerce modules, VI applications and trade show materials.
- batch production
- shared visual standard
- monthly rhythm
Single Task / Sprint
Some work should be bought as a clean task. Some work needs a sprint.
A single task is appropriate when the question is narrow and the output is obvious. A sprint is better when several pieces have to move together: page structure, copy, visuals, review, follow-up or supplier communication.
- Single Task: page critique, RFQ reply rewrite, quote comparison, image brief or small deck polish.
- Sprint: landing page rebuild support, keynote deck development, supplier search round or analytics cleanup.
- Pricing driver: clarity of input, number of outputs, revision depth, decision risk and turnaround pressure.
Monthly Bench / Retainer
Recurring work should not be re-negotiated like a street market every Monday.
When a company repeatedly needs pages, decks, sales material, sourcing follow-up or design production, a monthly model is usually cleaner. The goal is to reduce the friction of restarting every small task from a cold inbox.
- Monthly Bench: mixed commercial, design, web and China-side task queue.
- Design Production Retainer: recurring visual output with a shared standard.
- Pricing driver: expected task volume, specialist mix, review load and monthly priority level.
China-side Coordination
Coordination costs money because reality resists clean spreadsheets.
Supplier replies are incomplete. Samples get delayed. Quote assumptions hide in packaging. Shipment labels need checking. China-side coordination is priced not only by the visible output, but by the chasing and judgment needed to make it useful.
- Common tasks: supplier search, quote comparison, sample coordination, pre-shipment checks and document coordination support.
- Boundary: coordination support, not licensed customs brokerage, legal advice or compliance certification.
- Pricing driver: number of suppliers, category complexity, urgency, responsiveness and evidence required.
Scope evidence
Before pricing, we identify the work’s pressure points.
The same request can vary wildly depending on input quality and decision risk. Send real materials so the model and quote can fit the work.
Send materials that show the current situation.
- website URL, page, deck or brand files
- RFQ emails, quote sheets or buyer objections
- product brief, supplier messages and sample notes
- PO, carton count, label files or inspection concerns
We look for the hidden workload.
- input quality and missing context
- output definition and revision depth
- specialist mix and coordination load
- urgency, risk and decision consequence
Pricing philosophy
The number should follow the work, not disguise it.
A quote is not a magic spell. It is a compact description of effort, risk, skill and time. Good pricing makes the relationship cleaner because it names what the project is really asking from the studio.
Good pricing starts with a visible task.
When the task is visible, the quote can be fair. When the task is hidden, every number becomes either a guess or a trap.
The right model reduces friction.
A repeated design queue should not be priced like a one-off audit. A coordination job should not be priced like a static document.
We price for usable outputs.
The point is not hours consumed or slides produced. The point is whether the work helps explain, persuade, compare, check or decide.
FAQ
Practical pricing questions.
Pricing stays civil when both sides admit that scope is real, urgency has a cost, and repeated work should not be handled like a first date every time.
Why not publish fixed prices?
Which model is best for a first project?
Can a monthly bench include different kinds of work?
Can we switch models later?
Start with scope evidence
Send the task, files, deadline and decision goal.
The fastest pricing review starts with real material: page links, decks, quote sheets, supplier messages, campaign screenshots, product photos, shipment notes or a task list. We will suggest the engagement model that fits before discussing the quote.
AstraX Pro - Room 2010, Tower D, City Plaza Square, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
